PLEASE CONSIDER THIS AN OPEN CALL FOR CHAPTERS. Contact us at the below address if you have a suggestion for a chapter that falls within the guidelines.The proposal outlines five sections. While the structure is open to some variation, accepted contributions will have to reflect one or deveral of these sections.
ABOUT THE OVER-ALL THEME: Over the years that WLS has been in existence, the conference has reflected technology and social change, in many different variations, but always with the challenge of learning and the learning society at the forefront.
In this book the primary focus is on the societal and cultural contexts of education technologies, from the point of view of how thei invitei interdisciplinary ferment in the field of future learning.
THE EDITORS
The section title refers on the one hand to analyses and reflections on contemporary societal conditions, and on the other hand it refers to pathways of energy flows. Positives and negatives combine, stability and instabilities converge; change is the result and different eras reflect different forces.
The emerging ecosystem of higher education is not easily understood without a reference to communications technologies. And that reference has a long history and a more recent one. In this section the focus is on the intersection of those two trajectories.
While the university as a social institution has existed for centuries, the concept and role of higher education in society has changed dramatically and unevenly on a global scale since WW2. The societal roles and impacts of higher education and research was in a sense rebooted with the invention of modern statistics. Decolonialisation changed the role of education in the global south. Globalization is now reshaping networks of networks in inter-national education. Technologies converge around satellite communication, digitalisation, computer efficiency and artificial intellicence.
While the university as a social institution has existed for centuries, the concept and role of higher education in society has changed dramatically and unevenly on a global scale since WW2. The societal roles and impacts of higher education and research was in a sense rebooted with the invention of modern statistics. Decolonialisation changed the role of education in the global south. Globalization is now reshaping networks of networks in inter-national education. Technologies converge around satellite communication, digitalisation, computer efficiency and artificial intellicence.
Much of the discussion regarding “future learning” and technology centers on pedagogy and on technology itself. And yet, the spaces we inhabit are key influences on how we interact, how we think, how we understand the particular kinds of knowledge pursued in higher education, and the particular kinds of vested interests that co-shape institutions.
As social institutions, universities and colleges are change-agents and custodians of stability at one and the same time. They are commercially driven, many of them. Others are politically contextualized. Ideologically, institution of higher education base themselves on research, with a key idea to pursue as balanced and objective insight as possible. In this final section, focus shifts to the question of how to firmly ground a critique of higher education? At what level does one critique a discipline, a cluster of disciplines, organizations, financial arrangements, vested interests?